K&K Partners Emblem
K&K Partners
Technology LawLegal Analysis

GPL Contamination and Copyleft Risks: Conducting Software Audits in Indian M&A

Published 18 July 2026
7 min read
Danish Kaur Mavi• Founder & Managing Partner

How undisclosed open-source dependencies derail acquisition valuations and how acquirers can structure indemnities and remedial software escrows.

The Hidden Cost of Unmanaged OSS

In modern software development, up to 90% of a modern enterprise codebase consists of third-party open-source components. While open-source accelerates time to market, the failure of target companies to track software licensing creates acute transactional hazards during technology acquisitions.

Understanding Copyleft and Viral Licences

Strong copyleft licences—notably the GNU General Public License (GPL v2 and v3)—stipulate that if proprietary code is statically linked to or derived from GPL-licensed software, the entire resulting codebase must be made available under the same open-source terms. In an acquisition context, this can destroy the proprietary exclusivity underpinning the transaction's valuation.

Structuring Transactional Safeguards

Buyers should insist on automated Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) code scans prior to closing and establish targeted escrow holdbacks allowing the target engineering team 60 to 90 days to refactor contaminated modules.

Authored by

Danish Kaur Mavi

Founder & Managing Partner

Consult Author
Related Reading

Related Blogs & Analysis

Initiate Engagement

Let's start a conversation.

Whether you are navigating a regulatory question, protecting an idea or building something new, we would be glad to hear from you.

Chambers Coordination
KNK
General Counsel & Inquiriescontact@knkpartners.co
Office LocationsGurugram & New Delhi, India
Response timeframe: Within 1 business day for institutional matters.